: Waiting for next track...

Summary of the Knights Hill Inquiry

Summary of the Knights Hill Inquiry

Published by Local Democracy Reporter Jessica Frank-Keyes
5:44am 20th January 2020. (Updated at 6:01am 24th January 2020)

Final arguments for and against controversial plans to build 600 homes at a medieval castle were heard at an “emotive” inquiry.

West Norfolk Council rejected developers Whistle Wood and Reffley Wood’s vision to build on land west of Knights Hill Village, outside South Wootton, near King’s Lynn, in March.

The developers appealed the decision, prompting a four-day planning inquiry into the scheme.

say no proposals

And on Friday, January 17, the developer and the council had their final chance to put their cases to the government’s inspector, Roisin Barrett, who will make a recommendation to the secretary of state ahead of his decision on the appeal outcome.

Tim Leader, on behalf of the council, told the inquiry harm could be avoided to the “striking, isolated location” by moving the development further back. He said:

“The castle was designed to facilitate views.

"The development would sever the lodge from its local context."

And Mr Leader described the developer’s claim that the scheme would “help solve some sort of crisis in the delivery of affordable housing” as “nonsense”.

Knight's hill proposals say no


He told the inquiry the developer had measured the need for affordable housing incorrectly.

“The problem is a serious one but the treatment of it has been entirely superficial.

“The existing proposals are simply not good enough. It is insensitive, it should be rejected and it should be reworked.”

Antony Crean QC, on behalf of the developer, said:

“The central question is whether the proposals are in line with the local plan. It is important this site comes forward for housing development as soon as possible.”

He told the inquiry the life chances of children who do not have a home to live in were worse than their peers, and said:

“They suffer more illness and injury, their educational attainment is lower, they’re more likely to commit crimes and more likely to have mental health problems.

“It is unacceptable that any right thinking persons should not want to address this issue as a matter of the highest priority.”

And he said harm caused by the development was minimal.

After the inquiry closed at 11.20am, Ms Barrett thanked the council, advocates and the public for participating in what she called an “emotive” process.

The deadline for her report to be submitted to the secretary of state for housing is Saturday, April 4.

Contact Us

If you would like to submit a query or provide more information on this story please get in touch below.

Please wait...
  • Up to 3 JPG or PNG images, 2MB max size
  • We will always endeavour to credit you when we publish your pictures.
  • By uploading you are agreeing to this non-exclusive reuse, royalty-free, across all KL.FM 96.7 platforms, which extends to our partner broadcasters.
  • You retain copyright to all images.
  • If you would like to send us a video, please upload to YouTube or similar and paste the video URL into the message above.